Rinde Eckert's And God Created Great Whales; Shange's for colored girls..., 25 Years Later
Nathan, Eckert's character in this 75-minute piece directed by David Schweizer, is a composer suffering from a disease that is destroying his memory, and he is intent on finishing his magnum opus?an opera based on Moby Dick?before his mind disappears. He orients himself each day with the help of a tape recorder tied around his neck, which tells him who he is and what to do, in a voice that may or may not be wholly benevolent (it could be a doctor's, or his own at an earlier time). A Muse in a red dress and whalebone corset, played by Nora Cole, shares the stage with him, prodding him to creative work, sometimes ministering to him; at the same time, her motivations are suspect. "She is a product of your imagination," says the taped voice, but this doesn't always ring true. Much of the text is sung, and the lithe and nimble Cole performs sinuous dances into which she sometimes draws the rotund and gracefully awkward Eckert.
At the outset, I thought the prime dramatic impulse of And God Created Great Whales was clear and clever: the presentation of Nathan as a sort of Ishmael of the technological age?an innocent creative spirit who is both enabled and encumbered by the various machines he needs to "record" an epic journey he has taken in his mind. (Many color-coded tape recorders are scattered about the set, one for his opera's "master tape," another for his daily work, another for incidental notes and so on.) Occasionally, however, despite his gentleness, the piece seemed to present Nathan as a modern Ahab?a disabled monomaniac hell-bent on a quest of "self-completion" he is certain not to survive and is incapable of learning from. At still other times, Eckert's stately slowness, with his heavy, rubbery body and monumental bald head, seemed an obvious reference to the whale?an ineluctable, prepotent, natural force destined to crush all punily human efforts to circumscribe it. (In the piece's latter half, the Muse grasps petulantly after independence, transforming into a famous, retired opera singer who begs him to write a cameo role for her.)
Frankly, though, I came to place very little stock in any of these interpretations. I found this piece confusing and hard to follow more often than not. The basic story of mental degeneration is certainly moving and accessible enough. ("In the end you will appear to remember nothing at all," says the taped voice. "Eventually you will forget how to breathe. One might say you will drown in your own ignorance.") Too often, though, the storytelling gets lost in the incomprehensibility of the operatically sung words, and behind layers of deliberate obscurity: the various unilluminating slippages in the Muse's identity, for instance, and abrupt insertions of dense passages from Melville (including digressions into such matters as sailors' cenotaphs). The net impression is of an opera manque about a confused man who fails to write an opera.
The piece's musical impulse, on the other hand, is admirably lucid and confident. Eckert is an inventive and absorbing composer, whose pieces here range from a prickly calypso interlude to a rousing, sermon-like oratorio arranged around two organ chords to fascinating "ambient" piano phrases that subtly reflect Nathan's periodic mental regressions. He has a fine tenor voice, which he prefers to challenge and not merely show off, and listening to it is the main pleasure of And God Created Great Whales.
Furthermore, the form of for colored girls, in which music, rhythm, movement and sensuality are used as the ligatures of a new, "maimed" poetic language (Shange's word), is a marvelous innovation that is still more talked about than emulated on our stages. (Shange has some substantial followers?notably Suzan-Lori Parks?but how often are they seen at the likes of the American Place Theater?) Even in an imperfect production, there is still much power in this concept. All the performers in Faison's uneven cast warm to their roles during the 90-minute show, each ends up with at least one inspired sequence, and a few are exceptionally radiant and animated (chiefly Katherine J. Smith and J. Ieasha Prime), offering tantalizing glimpses of what for colored girls might have looked like (and might look like again) in its full glory.
There is a general spuriousness to the action for which Grant is wholly responsible: Adam's character is too irredeemably glib and unimpeachably superficial, and it just won't wash that everyone maintained his lie all those years. Grant has nothing to do with the epidemic of indication on this stage, however; it was up to the director and the actors to flesh out their relationships and clarify their motivations and intentions with regard to each other. Fans of Snakebit are advised to let this ill-starred project pass (its admirably humane politics notwithstanding) and wait for the next piece by this provocative but still erratic actor-playwright.